Jerome Kunkel , an 18 - twelvemonth - old senior at Our Lady of the Sacred Heart / Assumption Academy in Walton , has now filed a cause against the Northern Kentucky Health Department ( NKY ) over the decision . TheNew York Timesreports the shoal told the unvaccinated scholarly person in February that he could not play in any basketball games as a result of the local health authority ’s posture .
allot to thelawsuit , this profane his right to exemption of religion . Citing his Catholic faith , he argues that “ any vaccinum that is derived from aborted foetal cells is base , illegal and sinful . ”
“ I do n’t believe in that vaccine at all and they are endeavor to push it on us , ” Kunkel say , concord toCNN affiliate WLWT .
The NKY have stuck by their decision , stating it ’s the best decisiveness for public wellness , especially when it comes to pregnant women and person with a counteract immune system . They also observe that the lawyer who lodge the wooing has taken to social media with “ ego - interested ” and “ inaccurate ” posts about chickenpox vaccination .
“ regrettably , some individuals , include the lawyer who register the lawsuit , have select to societal spiritualist to spread misinformation as part of their litigation strategy , ” the NKY say in astatement .
So , what are the existent fact when it comes to vaccines and their use of human cells ?
Most commonly used vaccinations use a pocket-sized number of well - ground human mobile phone lines that were sop up from descendent cells of fetuses that were abort decades ago . They are descendant electric cell , so the vaccines do not carry any of the cells from the original abortion . It ’s also worth pointing out that the abortion were not undertaken with the aim of producing vaccines .
Unlike bacteria , computer virus need a legion to outlive , so the descendant cells are the medium in which these vaccines are make . For example , the chickenpox vaccine is grow in cells originally derived froma foetus aborted in the former sixties .
The Catholic Church has a foresightful story of query the ethics of this practice due to its absolute enemy to miscarriage . However , theirmost late stanceis that there ’s “ no proper ground for refusing immunisation against dangerous contractable disease … specially in luminance of the business that we should all have for the health of our tiddler , public health , and the common goodness . ”
